Sunday, 29 January 2017

Donald Trump - An Enigma












Donald Trump has defied all expectations from the very start of his presidential campaign more than a year ago. Very few people believed that he would actually run, then he did. They thought he wouldn't be a serious candidate and will not do well in the polls, then he did. They said he wouldn't win any primaries, then he did. They said he wouldn't get the Republican nomination even if he wins the primaries, then he did. Finally, they said there was no way he could match Hillary’s candidature, let alone win the election. Now he is President Trump! Rest is history!

Trump, the businessman, has shown that he can turn a negative situation into his advantage, after all he has seen bankruptcies and emerged stronger by cutting deals! So who better than him to turn a controversy, or even notoriety, into a winning position, by a good margin. Despite the abrasive and negative campaign, the Trump brand has clearly made its impact. As Donald Trump made the journey with his pompous showmanship, there was no trace of any doubt and he was oozing with his characteristic confidence, projecting supreme self-assuredness, the personal magnetism, the winning aura that's so appealing to many of his followers.

He has demonstrated his skills at setting the agenda, and framing the contest on his own terms. Trump owes his success to what he calls “truthful hyperbole”. He claims it's an innocent form of exaggeration - and a very effective form of promotion." 

Transferring his skills as a reality TV star to the election campaign trail, he reduced the complex global issues into simple black or white messages. He anchored his campaign on simple messages
like “Make America Great Again” #MAGA, Build the Wall, Drain the Swamp, Bring back the jobs, America First, Locker her up and Rigged. He attacked the government policies on trade and treaties as destroying American jobs. His campaign, simply said ‘Our government is screwing you’. So the enemy was within namely the Establishment, Democrats, the Republican elite, the media, and the crony corporates.

One political observer (Nunberg) commented that, "The idea of the wall was genius too. It touches on immigration, so it's a policy issue. Two, it touches on Trump's brand. Builder, Developer. Three, it fits the rationale and appeal of his candidacy. The wall. Subliminally, you're saying it's time to take care of America's problems. Then you have the wall between the Trump people and the establishment people. And every single time you mentioned the word wall, wall, wall, on TV, the prospective primary voter is going to think, 'Trump, Trump, Trump. He's our protective wall. To protect us.”

He's a natural when it comes to the stagecraft of campaigning. It was simple and repetitive which struck a strong chord with the voters.

His attack on unauthorised Mexican immigrants, whom he decried as criminals and "rapists," had an electrifying effect on his candidacy. Far from disqualifying him from the presidential nomination, they propelled him towards it. A hardline stance on immigration, especially when coupled with fears about national security, is a big vote winner. When a poll suggested he had fallen behind, he announced his plan to temporarily ban Muslims from entering America.  Again, his poll numbers soared. It's been the calculus of his campaign.  His outspoken attacks also reinforced another of his great selling points, his delight in railing against "political correctness". These Trump tirades especially resonate with his core support, lower income white males, and that earned him the blue-collar appeal.  Whatever the reason, he was bulletproof.

Trump insulted decorated war veteran John McCain. He picked a fight with Fox News and its popular presenter, Megyn Kelly. He doubled down when asked how he once mocked the weight of a Hispanic beauty pageant winner. He offered a half-hearted apology when the secret video surfaced of his boasting about making unwanted sexual advances towards women. He gaffed his way through the three presidential debates. The criticism that he is a racist demagogue, and the shower of international criticism especially from Muslims and Hispanics, did nothing to harm his candidacy.

None of it mattered. Quite the contrary. While he took dips in the polls following some of the more outrageous incidents, his approval was like a cork - eventually bouncing back to the surface. Perhaps the various controversies came so hard and fast that none had time to draw blood.

Trump labeled competitors with unflattering names like “Crooked Hillary” and “Lyin’ Ted” to solicit reactions from the candidates and psychologically repositioned their standing among voters. He also applied a problem/solution marketing formula. He framed the “problem” as the nation being in economic and societal trouble, rallied people to galvanize their dissatisfaction with government and positioned himself as the change agent.

As to "false equivalency" - they treated Trump as a nasty, throwback, stupid, ignorant racist and bigot. They treated Hillary as a queen, only awaiting the coronation that was her due. 

He ran against the Democrats. He also ran against the powers within his own party. He beat them all.

In the final analysis, the rise of Trump says a lot about the deep rooted anti-establishment sentiment and points to voters’ distrust for Hillary than a ringing endorsement for Trump. This was Brexit Mark II when the popular sentiment was against the politicians who have consistently let down the vast majority of middle and lower income earners.

However, his rudimentary policy platforms will come under increasing scrutiny, like the apparently unspecified plan he says he will destroy ISIS within months. It's the same story for his fiscally questionable promises to simultaneously cut taxes, raise military spending, take care of veterans, safeguard social safety net programs and eliminate the national debt.

Let's fast forward into his new “POTUS” role – Phew! What a week that was!!!

For Trump, winning the Presidency was not enough. He wanted to win the popular vote too and has launched an investigation on Voter fraud. A man who has obsessed for TRP ratings for his shows, wanted a mega event for his coronation. But that was not to be. The crowd was small, the weather was bad and his speech was dire.






His ego was dented by the sparse inaugural crowd but that didn’t deter him from making outlandish claims with his “alternative reality”. His Press Secretary, Sean Spicer, made the claim as “This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period. Both in person and around the globe.”  When the media confronted with facts, Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s counsel, justified Sean Spicers figures as “alternative facts”. And then they threated to hold the media accountable for bad press!

O’ what an eventful first week Trump Presidency has delivered! Seven days into his presidency, the series of official actions, at the rate of as many as five a day, has created a new national reality on central policy concerns from the environment to voting rights to international commitments to immigration, healthcare and trade; making it clear that as President he is not going to moderate his positions than what he took as a candidate. Since being elected, Trump has largely stood by his campaign promises. Here's a breakdown of some of his plan and initial actions:


1.    Repeal Obama care


Trump’s first move was to roll back the “regulatory burden” of Obamacare pending the act’s “prompt repeal”.


2.   Withdraw from Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)


Trump said he intends to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations and replace it with "fair bilateral trade deals." And he has already initiated the process.

The move will shatter President Barack Obama's aim of strengthening US influence in Asia and could leave the Western world's trade agenda in disarray. The TPP, which was aimed at linking the US economy with 11 countries around the Pacific, took years to negotiate.

"The TPP without the United States is meaningless," Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said
during a recent visit to Argentina. Some experts claimed that the TPP would kill jobs and worsen income inequality across the 12 nations, particularly in the US.  Trump said he intends to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations and replace it with "fair bilateral trade deals." And he has already initiated the process.

The move will shatter President Barack Obama's aim of strengthening US influence in Asia and could leave the Western world's trade agenda in disarray. The TPP, which was aimed at linking the US economy with 11 countries around the Pacific, took years to negotiate.

"The TPP without the United States is meaningless," Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said during a visit to Argentina.

Some experts claimed that the TPP would kill jobs and worsen income inequality across the 12 nations, particularly in the US.  He has also indicated that he will review the NAFTA pact.

3.   Examine Visa programs

During the final weeks of his campaign, his plan that would end illegal immigration and suspend immigration from terror problem regions. He also said he would "stop illegal immigration, deport all criminal aliens."

In one of his most provocative actions, he has passed one of the most controversial executive orders that
is riling people up within America and around the world. President Donald Trump's seismic move to ban more than 130 million people from the United States and to deny entry to all refugees reverberated worldwide Saturday, as chaos and confusion rippled through US airports, American law enforcement agencies and foreign countries trying to grasp Washington's new policy.
Trump's executive order bars citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries (Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia) from entering the United States for the next 90 days and suspends the admission of all refugees for 120 days causing serious disruption resulting in
 large scale popular outrage amongst people across the globe and within the US with many US corporates speaking out against the move reiterating vociferously that this goes against what America stands for!


4.   Build the Wall

Trump issued an executive order on Wednesday to 
“Build the Wall” calling for “the immediate
construction of a physical wall on the southern border, monitored and supported by adequate personnel so as to prevent illegal immigration, drug and human trafficking, and acts of terrorism”.

Trump proposes to pay for the wall by levying a 20% duty on Mexico.  He also moved to deny federal funds to "sanctuary cities" – the more than 400 cities and counties in the US that offer some form of safe haven to America’s 11 million undocumented migrants.

5.   Cancel environmental restrictions

Trump was consistent in his promise to reduce environmental restrictions. Now he is vowing to deliver on that. The plan, which Trump has previously said he would scrap, targets existing coal-fired and natural gas power plants in an effort to reduce greenhouse emissions in the US by 32% by 2030. It is expected to go before the Supreme Court in early 2017.


6.   Cut regulations on businesses

Trump says he will formulate a "rule that says for every one new regulation, two old regulations must be eliminated." He has previously spoken on his desire to axe the Dodd-Frank Act, which was created after the financial crisis to abide by a litany of new rules to prevent another crash.


The Fed also does annual "stress tests" to simulate whether the bank was strong enough financially to withstand another financial crisis. All that regulation has triggered huge backlash from Wall Street and Republicans, including Trump, though he has also supported stricter regulations in the past.


7.   Protect against cyber attacks


Trump says he will establish a cyber-review team made up of members of the military, law enforcement and private sector. He wants to audit the security of the federal government's computer systems and strengthen the hacking division of the US military. Trump also wants to "develop the offensive cyber capabilities we need to deter attacks by both state and non-state actors and, if necessary, to respond appropriately."


The US government is credited with having some of the most dangerous hacking tools on the planet. Yet these weapons haven't deterred Russia from hacking into the Democratic National Committee or China from hacking into American companies.


8.
      Enact lobbying bans – “Drain the Swamp”


Trump promised to "drain the swamp," so it's little surprise that he has focused his ire on lobbyists. The move will prohibit officials from becoming a lobbyist for five years after leaving government.

Trump's goal of making sure that people aren't using the government to enrich themselves and using their service in government to do that, says Republican National Committee spokesman Sean Spicer.


"Everybody's a lobbyist down there," he said. "That's the problem with the system -- the system," Trump said. "We're doing a lot of things to clean up the system. But everybody that works for government, they then leave government and they become a lobbyist, essentially. I mean, the whole place is one big lobbyist."


In Summary


The Trump is acting like a man in a hurry. He seems to be clearly conveying to his supporters that he means business and will not fail them on the campaign promises.


However, the irony in some of Trump’s actions is not lost. Although Trump ran as a populist, railing at the elite on behalf of blue-collar workers, he has surrounded himself during his campaign with plutocrats. And now that he’s president, he’s elevating them to power. Trump’s proposed Cabinet has a net worth of more than $6 billion with some of them who have benefited from favourable Government policies in the past!


It is equally undeniable that the new US President also put the rest of the world on notice. His penchant for rapid actions and confrontational style will have far reaching implications for both America and the rest of the world.


We are likely to witness a more protectionist, inward-looking, self-serving, America First policies from the US.  This will undoubtedly result in increasing retaliatory actions from other trading blocs and is likely to reshape the world economic order.  In the short term, there is likely to be a heightened chaos and uncertainty arising from US policy actions that can cause significant disruptions to cross border trade and global economic growth as well as many business models. 


On the geo-political front, Trump is likely to create new political alliances though he has reversed his position on NATO with an agreement to continue his support to it. Trump’s approach to US relationship with Russia including any lifting of sanctions will have serious geo-political implications that might potentially test other alliances and may create a new political order of alliance partners for US, Japan, China, NATO, Middle East and the rest of the world.


One thing is for sure is that there will never be a dull moment in Trump Presidency!

Saturday, 12 November 2016

The Hype and Hyperbole of Demonetisation of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 Notes

Let me say at the outset that I welcome the demonetisation move but do not support:
·      the shock and awe approach that has caused hardships to a vast majority of citizens for the limited benefit this may deliver (more about this later); and
·    the hype and hyperbole that this action will deliver a death blow to corruption and black money, which it certainly will not, as the problem of corruption and unaccounted wealth is much bigger and is not limited to hoarding of cash, which if anything is less than 5% of total black money.
Hence, the claims by the Government that this will end the menace of black money and corruption are simply outlandish.  Also, the simultaneous introduction of Rs 2,000 note undermines their claim and it simply does not fit the storyline of an attack on black money and corruption. 
Now, let's look at the extent of the possible real benefits of this move. 
As noted above, to say that this will deliver a death knell to corruption and black money is a massive overstretch and a great exaggeration, and I will come to that in a bit. But those who are going on an overdrive about this being an unprecedented move of epic proportions and the next best thing since sliced bread, need to read up a bit of history.  This has happened in the past in India in 1978 and again to a limited extent in 2005 when older notes were recalled but in a more orderly and sensible manner.  This has also been tried in many other countries and what these experiences tell us is that demonetisation on its own has a very limited effect for a short while unless backed with several other measures of surveillance.  
This is simply because of the fact that significant amount of black money is held via overseas bank accounts or in offshore real assets through a web of shell companies, a fact acknowledged earlier by the ruling party prior to general elections (Kaala dhan videshi bankon mein jama hai!). However, equally it’s undeniable that some portion of it is also held domestically but bulk of this is in the form of real estate, financial assets through trusts, Gold and some amount of it in cash.  And it's the last part of this that demonetisation will address and deliver some benefit. This was also the political position of the ruling party back in 2005 when they protested against a move by the previous Government to recall higher denomination notes. So, what are the real benefits of this move?

Let’s look at some of the specifics around expected benefits of this demonetisation and the ways in which this may have an impact:
1.     For starters, it will invalidate the fake notes being pumped by some of our neighbours through Nepal and other porous borders;
2.       It will bring more cash into the banking system, as even legitimately held cash with people will find its way into the banks, at least for some time (until the cash withdrawal limits are increased);
3.   It will bring some amount of unaccounted cash which may either flow back into the banks where people simply decide to account for it and pay tax or otherwise use their extended family and friends network to split the amounts into smaller amounts to recycle into the banking network; and
4.       Finally, some cash may simply be unclaimed (though highly unlikely with the Indian Jugaad system).

The benefits case
1.                   Fake Currencies
The issue of fake currencies was becoming a serious menace and this move clearly stamps it out. It will take a while for them to master the art of new notes that have, purportedly, advanced security features.  However, the immediate adverse impact of this will be felt in the form of slower GDP growth and lower consumer spending.  The positive effect may be in the form of Inflation trending lower because of this.

2.                   Cash flowing into the banking system
Irrespective of having a bank account, people legitimately hold cash for their routine and emergency requirements.  This move will result in this cash flowing back into the bank, only to be withdrawn after a while.  So this will only result in a temporary improvement in the liquidity position of banks as it will leave once the new notes are available and withdrawal limits are lifted. So the real benefit from this is questionable.

However, the cash that was not previously within the banking system will flow into it for the first time.  This will lead to an increase in bank deposits and perhaps a reasonable amount of this may stay for a longer period.  To the extent of the stability of these deposits, this may help the credit creation process. However, for the credit creation to occur, the PSU banks that are weighed down by non-performing loans have to be recapitalised.  So, no tangible benefit to the economy until and unless the banks are recapitalised.

3.                   Unaccounted Cash flowing back
This is potentially what the Government is really targeting. If some element of unaccounted money finds its way back into the system, this will help in improving the tax take and the Government stands to benefit. Given the ingenuity of these individuals in protecting their cash, it remains to be seen whether this yields a big tax collection or results in just an increase in number of bank accounts and balances as hoarders find ways to split the amounts. It has to be noted that the recently concluded income declaration scheme in September 2016, resulted in an income disclosure of Rs 65,000 crores ($10bn) and netted a tax take of Rs 29,000 Crores ($4.5 bn), much less than the expected hundreds of billions of $. 

4.                   Unclaimed balances
And finally any unclaimed notes in circulation, a highly unlikely scenario as people will find ways to recycle (remember, India is a land of Jugaad), will result in a clear benefit to the RBI and the Government, as RBI can extinguish its liabilities to this extent.  This gain can be used by the RBI to pay dividend to the Government which reduce the fiscal deficit. But this process cannot begin until next fiscal year which is when the aggregate of unclaimed balances will be known as RBIs window for accepting notes extends to 31st March 2017.
Now let's compare the magnitude of black money and the minimal extent to which this action is going to address the problem.

Total money in circulation according RBI statistics is Rs 16.4 lacs crores ($250bn if you can't get your head around that). Of this, about 86% or Rs 14.2 lacs crores ($ 215bn) is represented by Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes as per table below.

According to the RBI's statistics, Scheduled Banks and other banks in India hold about ~Rs 6 lacs Crores ($91bn) in Rs 500/Rs 1000 notes after applying the 86% on their total cash holdings to estimate the amount held in Rs 500 and Rs1,000 notes, in their branches and ATMs.
Then you have organisations like the Railways, Post offices, PSUs, Corporates, Petrol Pumps, Hospitals, Government offices, businesses and traders holding cash as part of their legitimate daily activities. Assuming that the legitimate portion of the cash holdings to be 2/3rd levels of banks (based on an estimate that recognises that the number of corporates, traders, organisations significantly outnumber the banks by several hundred folds), it comes to Rs 4 lacs crore ($60bn), then the remaining cash amount reduces to less than half of the total. So that leaves the balance cash to ~Rs 4.2 lacs Crores (or $64bn). The table below shows the estimates:

Details
Rs (Crores)
~ USD billions
% to total cash in circulation
Aggregate Money in circulation (RBI statistics)
1,640,000
250
100%
Aggregate Money in Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes (86% of total per RBI Statistics)
1,420,000
215
86%
Money held with Scheduled Commercial Banks and other FIs includind Cash reserve ratio of Rs 5lacs Crores with RBI (Branches and ATMs) (estimated at 86% of total cash in Rs 500/1000 notes)
~ 6,00,000
91
36%
Estimate cash with Post Office, Corporates, Railways, Traders, Petrol Pumps, Govt. etc.
~ 4,00,000
45
18%
Estimated Balance left with individuals (surprisingly a number we associate with fraud and cheating!)
~4,20,000
~ 64
26%

Out of the estimated amount of cash held by individuals, we can make a reasonable split of cash held by urban and rural folks:
·         Urban India - Legitimately held cash for routine and emergency expenses (assuming an average of Rs 2,500* per person for the 400 million urban population) - Rs 1 lac crore ($15bn)
·         Rural and Semi Urban – Mainly cash users or not in the banking system - say an average of Rs 500* for the 800 million - Rs 40,000 crores ($6bn)
(* average holdings based on research of Rama Bijapurkar - http://www.ice360.in/uploads/files/ibgc-wp14-03-bijapurkar-et-al.pdf)

So, if we adjust the legitimate amounts held by individuals of ~Rs 1.4 lacs Crores ($21bn) from the aggregate Rs 4.2 lacs Crores ($64bn) of balances with individuals, the net estimated amount of unaccounted cash would be ~Rs 2.8 lacs crores or ~$ 43bn.

This is just about 2% of our GDP!  Now cutting all the noise, compare this to the total unaccounted money which was estimated to be ~$1 trillion and you can very easily see that it represents less than 5% of the black money problem!

Even if we made an overly optimistic assumption that the entire amount of ~$43bn can be recognised as a gain either through tax take or unclaimed balances, this would still represent only 4.3% of the total black money problem.  While this is still a welcome development and needs to be applauded, but it needs to be kept in the context of the magnitude of the overall problem. 

So I would say to all those screaming that this will end black money that after all the noise subsides and the chest thumping is over, please realise that the black money problem is far from over! We have just scratched the surface. But the reintroduction of higher denomination notes will only make the problem worse unless further measure to curb cash transactions are introduced.

An important point to understand that cash is fungible. It has no permanent label as black or white.
You withdraw cash from the bank and buy a durable without a bill to avoid GST or pay a bribe for any approval you need, it become black. The same recipient goes with that cash to a supermarket or a restaurant and spends it and gets a bill, it become white.  So not all cash is black and not all cash is white!!!
So the solution is not attacking cash because it will start the day the scheme ends as people as will about their old ways.
What's required is the incentives that drive creation of black money need to be addressed. Attacking cash is like treating the symptom than the underlying problem!

So was the midnight strike really necessary and worth it?

Now let’s look at the dramatic way in which this decision was announced. The move took many by surprise and the reactions in social media has since moved from an initial euphoria to a state of chaos and panic that has left crores of citizens on the streets queuing in front of banks and ATMs looking for the right kind of cash (as lower denominations are only 14% of stock in circulation trying to replace 44% of cash that needs to be replaced!).  To top it, the new currency notes do not fit the ATM machines and it will take more than a couple of weeks for ATMs to deliver the higher denomination notes of Rs 500 and Rs 2,000! And the government says it has been planning for well over six months!

In my opinion, the benefits of this surprise element is being significantly overplayed by the Government. If the Government is conducting inspections of gold traders and other places of suspected of conversion of cash, they could still adopt the same process of surveillance and could have given people a reasonable notice to organise their lives.  This would have resulted in an orderly withdrawal of old notes and still snuff out the fake currencies without the attendant chaos and hardships to a large section of the population for a limited benefit!

The immediate withdrawal is unjustified as it results in hardships to 99% of the population to attack 1% of hoarders. More so, when taken in the overall context of the contribution of unaccounted cash to the black money problem as bulk of it is held overseas in offshore assets or in real estate or in gold.

While people can be asked to make sacrifices for the nation’s cause, this seemingly ill planned execution together with its limited benefits does not quite fit that bill. The simultaneous introduction of the higher denomination Rs 2,000 note blows a hole into that argument as it clearly defeats the purpose of stamping out black money! All this exercise does, at best, is to reset the base for a small part of the overall issue which could have been managed better.

Here's some context in simple layman terms of the current exercise:
If you earn Rs 100 per annum, how tickled would you be if I told you that you will get a one-time bonus of Rs 2? Mighty thrilled?
And for that I have to inconvenience 99% of people to secure that, and I am not even sure whether it will be Rs 2...That is the nature of the current abrupt demonetisation. This could have been orderly without having to cause chaos, panic and distress.
And BTW, there is another Rs 50 that I know can be recovered without having to disturb the 99% of the people. Ah, but that will involve upsetting some powerful business magnates. We will leave that for another day...
A surgical strike is a precision strike with precise intelligence. Not aimless shooting in the dark in the hope of hitting some targets!
And creating an easy path for future creation of black money cannot be part of such an objective (re. Rs2,000 Note).
Hence, the Government’s claim that this action will stamp out black money is tenuous and a fantasy as the Rs 2,000 note will only accentuate the problem of black money creation. While the move is intended to catch the cash hoarders unaware, there are other effective administrative tools in the form of better surveillance, improving the analytics and intelligence network, and taking action against those who facilitate the fake currency trade from our side of the border.

Conclusion

The monetisation move is to be welcomed as there will be some benefit from this exercise but the justification for a sudden withdrawal is questionable as the surveillance on exchange of notes could have ensured that even orderly withdrawal would succeed.

If the Government is seriously minded to tackle black money menace, it has focus on the 96% of the problem and work with other G20 members on information sharing and take prompt action.  So far nothing much has been heard after the initial claim of 650 odd names.  Even the Supreme Court has now stopped asking for updates! So the judiciary is also sleeping at the wheel.

I also question the associated hype and hyperbole, which simply seems to exploit the financial and economic illiteracy that is prevalent even amongst the educated middle class who haven’t comprehended the issue, let alone the rural illiterate.

While there is some gain to the Government in the form of a potential tax take or unclaimed balances which will help to reduce the fiscal deficit, but to proclaim that this is the end of corruption and black money is far-fetched.

This move is neither going to deliver a death knell to corruption nor eradicate black money! And the rhetoric doesn’t gel with the simultaneous introduction of the higher denomination note!! The shock and awe approach doesn’t quite justify the hardship inflicted on millions of ordinary folks.

#Demonetisation #BlackMoney